« Al Gore named hypocrite by conservative group | Main | Hollywood Peace Vigil gets national attention »

March 20, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341e80fc53ef00d8341e810253ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Witnessing for Peace in Iraq:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Tompaul

In January 2003 I attended the anti-war rally in Washington, D.C. It saddened me at the time that there was so little "mainstream" leadership involved. But the war was too great an evil to worry about when the rest of "acceptable" society would catch up. I could only think, Buckle your handbaskets, America . . .

Nathan Brown

This is very cool. Congratulations to Ryan, the Hollywood church and others for stepping up on this issue.

If only more of our churches . . .

Huiling Lee

Your efforts to promote peace and address social justice issues are truly appreciated, Ryan. Sorry you were unable to fly to DC but my husband, Siroj Sorajjakool, and I were there. We were able to participate in the march for peace in Iraq - so we like to think we helped represent you and other Adventists who would have liked to have been there too.

Marcel

Ryan,

I had a great time at the peace march, thank you so much for stepping out in faith and answering this call. This mustard seed is only the beginning.....

Moshe Liebowitz

The clergy should stick to theology and leave politics alone. It's great to say you're for peace, but the peace crowd NEVER articulates a cogent U.S. foreign policy philosophy. Currently, the leftists in the U.S. are condemning the war, but when it really comes down to it, the mainstream Democrat party really doesn't articulate anything different from a foreign policy perspective. U.S. foreign policy since the 1960s has largely been similar from president to president, regardless of whether it has been Democrat or Republican. The policy has been, ostensibly, to extend U.S. hegemony over the world under the guise of "spreading democracy" (and to support Israel). So if you really want peace, start advocating some foreign policy perspectives that are actually different. For example, how about advocate an anti-Zionist, isolationist foreign policy. After all, is not support for Israel a major component to the interventionist approach the U.S. has taken in the Middle East? But yet, few in the peace crowd are willing to advocate a hardline anti-Zionist position and actually offer any alternatives. They just jump on the popular band wagon for peace because its the latest bleeding-heart cause. They jump on board with the peace groups without concern that many of these groups have ties to far left Marxist and Communist organizations. It was definitely true in the Vietnam era, when Marxist radicals were behind both the Civil Rights and anti-war movements. And Communist influence by these groups was not really aimed at "peace" or "civil rights", but merely to weaken the establishment in the great ideological struggle. So, the peace crowd becomes the "useful idiots". I also think to take a position against Israel would require the large Evangelical block in the U.S. to come to grips with its Dispensationalist eschatology (the viewpoint that is entrenched in the Dallas Theological Seminary) which views the literal State of Israel as being super significant. President Bush is an Evangelical and probably believes in this stuff and it invariably affects foreign policy.

Shoshana

I am shocked at Moshe's comments above. The Iraq war was an unjust and immoral war. It doesn't matter the policy objectives. War is bad except for World War II, since we were fighting right wingers! Colonialism is bad since it oppresses people and this is exactly what our involvement in Iraq is all about. Just give peace a chance! Let's just pull out of Iraq right now and let the chips fall where they do. No war for oil!!! Also, the clergy are always involved in social issues. Look at all the good Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have done over the years. Who was standing up for the minorities in New York when they were the victims of the white power structure? I didn't see Pat Robertson out there. No, it was only Reverend Al who dared to march for justice and peace. So sometimes it is only those on the left who dare stand up for social justice. It shouldn't matter if the peace movement has Communist ties or not. Our intentions are good and we are showing that we care about social justice. Why should it matter what our foreign policy is? We are for peace and good will towards all in a beautiful mosiac of multicultures living together in harmoney in a environmentally responsible way.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

QUOTE

  • Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Hate multiplies hate, violence multiplies violence, and toughness multiplies toughness in a descending spiral of destruction.... The chain reaction of evil - hate begetting hate, wars producing more wars - must be broken, or we shall be plunged into the dark abyss of annihilation.
    - Martin Luther King, Jr.
My Photo

Take Action

  • Help Obama End Torture

Statistics


  • View My Stats
  • Cost of the War in Iraq
    (JavaScript Error)
  • Locations of visitors to this page